Thoughts on Characterization

I know that this is the first time that I have used this site for anything other than posting portions of stories. But I originally intended it to be a much more comprehensive collection of my thoughts and ideas when I started it. I had a thought about how I tend to write characters and started to squeeze it into a facebook status, but it was not to be contained in such an abbreviated format. So here are my current thoughts on character, with some behind the scenes information about Without a Name (which hopefully you can expect more of soon).

Character has always been something of a struggle for me, whether I am trying to tell a story or play a role-playing game. One of the problems is inherent in the way that I write (or play) much of the time. I don’t do a lot of preparation and tend to just jump in where I see the action happening and explore what happens as it ‘happens’ on page (or in game). Which tends to work out pretty well for me as I think faster than I write and can usually keep ahead of myself and that helps to maintain my energy level and interest in what I am writing and I am constantly surprising myself with little gems of information. But it means that I don’t always (read almost never) come up with backstory for my characters unless the character actively ends up exploring their own past. This means my characters are often without a proper framework through which to explore the world save for my own experiences and gut instincts as to how ‘they’ would act.

I often find that it is difficult to flesh out my characters history when I try and so I tend to focus on the character at the moment, attitudes and opinions divorced from past experience. (How important can the details of an unremarkable past really be–I say tongue-in-cheek.) However, as a result my characters are all filtered through my own experiences without a lens of their own to help me focus them, this often leads to my characters feeling very similar even if they have different roles and attitudes. (Mind you, usually they won’t all act the same though they did in one of the stories I wrote, Wingless, because all the characters were, before the story began, essentially boring teenagers in a generally normal world that I didn’t care about and still don’t really know how to deal with.) On top of that my characters all apparently tend to sound like me. (Or so I have been told, I have trouble seeing this particular problem because I’m perfectly comfortable with my idiosyncrasies of vocabulary and word choice and so they don’t register as out of the ordinary to me.)

I have recently been working on Wingless but the lack of characterization kept showing up in problems with the dialog and with the very structure of the plot. So I have set that aside until I can figure out what to do about it. But it got me thinking about my other stories and I evaluated Without a Name with that in mind. And I think I avoided much of problem that has made Wingless so difficult for me.

For Without a Name I came up with a situation for the main character before I came up with anything else. Which is somewhat unusual, but I think that it was very useful to me as I have been writing it. I had this image of a young girl covered in dirt and sitting under a table in a nicely furnished house where everyone pretended she wasn’t there. I knew that this girl was somehow very powerful, so I jotted down a quick scene where a man was tasked with finding this important girl named Underfoot, this later became the prologue. And when I was searching for something to write about in the last two weeks of NaNoWriMo 2008 I found that scene and remembered the image and it exploded into this story. Underfoot channels and amplifies all of my insecurity and reliance on other people, but she has her own reasons and experiences for me to draw on and I hope that makes her at least somewhat relateable as a character.

The other problem that I have with character voice through dialog are compounded by the fact that the majority of the draft that has been posted here so far was written in the course of one week. But this problem is much easier to overcome than actual lack of character and I hope to solve that in later drafts by taking more care with my word choice in dialog and developing more voices.

I hope that this piece has at least been interesting. I must say that I had forgotten how much I rely on parentheticals when I am writing without turning on my ‘formal’ academic style. (Mind you I have lots of parentheticals even then, they are just usually switched to comma parenthesis rather than full parenthesis.)

Comments

  1. Rosemary

    Ah, parentheticals. I sometimes find they threaten to take over an entire post/essay/letter/insert-whatever-type-of-non-fictive-prose-I’m-currently-writing.

    On the one hand, I think when drafting you often need to just go with whatever you do as a writer–be it plot or characterization or whatever. However, dividing fiction into various elements–plot, characterization, point of view, etc etc–while useful and necessary, is also a bit artificial: they are all connected and all need each other. So sometimes lack of characterization will indeed interfere with plot.

    Good post. ๐Ÿ™‚

  2. Post
    Author
    Marlin

    Thank you Rosemary.

    It is rather artificial to divide the “elements of fiction”, and I tend not to think about it while I am writing. It is all ‘the story’. However on later evaluation of some of my stories I have found that I struggle to make the characters deep, believable and detailed enough which has weakened many other aspects of the story.

  3. Aaron

    Although I am not a perfect raconteur, or story teller, my primary concern for the first draft is the story. That’s creates the first draft. Second draft….grammar. Third draft…..thematic material, character material, and other material that creates the actually finished form of the story. Thus, story first then grammar, and then theme, character, and other material that I want to add (like historical material for instance).

  4. Rosemary

    Grammar before character?! That blows my mind. O_o I … severely disagree. ๐Ÿ˜› I guess because grammar-checking is about polishing things up, and if you make any changes beyond the sentence level in your third, fourth, etc drafts you’re going to have to double-check grammar anyway … *shrugs*

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *